Design that converts — without the design-trends tax.

Both. We can hand off to your engineers or build it ourselves. Most clients prefer the latter because the design rarely survives a handover without compromises.

Unlimited within scope. The scope is fixed, not the iteration count. We'd rather iterate three times to right than ship once to 'done'.

Yes — but only as part of a broader brand engagement. We don't sell logo-only projects because logos in isolation rarely work.

AI products break most UX assumptions, so you need patterns built for them. We design for streaming first (progressive disclosure, never a blank loading state), graceful uncertainty (confidence indicators, citation surfaces, refusal copy), and conversational tool use (typed inputs that map to a structured action, not free-text guesswork). Multimodal inputs — file drops, voice, image — are first-class. The patterns come from shipping real systems like our [adaptive AI interview agent](/case-studies/interview-agent) which lifted user completion 47%. Generic component libraries do not cover this surface.

You can expect dev-ready Figma files in three weeks for a typical marketing site or single-product surface. Brand systems with logo, type, colour, motion, and a documented design system land at four to six weeks. Larger SaaS product redesigns — multi-surface flows, dashboard IA, design tokens, Storybook documentation — take six to ten weeks. Research-led engagements (user interviews, usability tests, A/B experiments) add two to four weeks depending on the test cadence. Every scope is fixed-price with revision unlimited within scope.

Marketing site design lands $8,000 to $25,000 fixed-price including dev-ready handoff. Brand systems with logo, type, colour, and a documented brand book run $15,000 to $45,000. Full SaaS product redesigns with a tokenised design system, Storybook docs, and engineering handoff land $35,000 to $90,000. Research-and-test engagements (user interviews + usability + A/B) are typically $12,000 to $30,000 layered on top. We will say no on the first call if the scope is purely cosmetic and a content or conversion problem is the actual blocker.

You measure both, but conversion is the contract. Every primary-CTA redesign we ship at Aiinfox lands with an A/B test live on day one and a measurable hypothesis written into scope. Median lift on primary CTA post-redesign sits at +42% across shipped engagements. Visual polish without a behavioural metric is decoration, and we will tell you on the first call if we think the brief is decoration-shaped. Conversion lift, WCAG AA conformance, and dev-ready handoff in three weeks are the three measurable outputs every web design engagement is judged on.

Yes — SEO preservation is a scope-line item, not a hope. We map every existing URL to its redesigned counterpart, audit the on-page signals (titles, headings, structured data, internal links) before the migration, and preserve them where they earn ranking. New design is shipped behind a feature flag or a staged rollout so you can validate Core Web Vitals and crawl behaviour before full cutover. Pair this with our [SEO and content team](/digital-marketing-seo) for a redesign that lifts conversion without losing organic traffic — a common failure mode of cosmetic-only rebrands.

Yes. WCAG 2.1 AA is the baseline on every component we ship — colour contrast, focus states, keyboard navigation, screen-reader semantics, motion-reduction preferences, and form-error patterns that work for assistive tech. The design system documents accessibility patterns alongside visual specs, so your engineering team is not guessing at implementation. Compliance is verified in CI (axe-core, Lighthouse a11y score) and on real assistive-tech devices for critical flows. WCAG conformance sits at 100% on shipped components.